Talk:Keres Defence
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
3. Nf3 and Bb2 (listed as responses in article) do not appear to be legal responses. Bd2, Nc3, and Nd2 seem possible. --Tabor 22:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Corrected. Sjakkalle 08:56, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
Qd2
[edit]No offense, but "Qd2" doesn't just "seem to be dubious", it's just plain bad, losing a queen for a bishop at no compensation. (unsigned)
- It is so obvious to even a beginner that I think it could be taken out. Bubba73 (talk), 05:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I took out most of that line. Bubba73 (talk), 05:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Keres Defence page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Keres Defence" page.