Talk:Wave drag
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Things are somewhat better for fuselage shaping
[edit]Should that be "wings" instead of "things?"
Boating wave drag?
[edit]Anyone want to chip in with some boating related wave drag info? I'm working over hull speed right now, and have linked to this article. There's some good source info at http://www.geocities.com/greglocock/hullres.htm and http://www.dynagen.co.za/eugene/hulls/ if anyone wants to start working on it. scot 15:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- It would be better to start a separate article on wave drag on objects in water, which is not due to formation of shock waves but because of ripples (waves) on the surface of water. Having both the under the same article would mean that one has to generalize the introduction to a point where it can lead to confusion. -Myth (Talk) 23:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wave drag page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wave drag" page.
Categories:
- C-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- C-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Engineering articles
- Low-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles