Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Adding false stations again by a unregistered editor. Page has also been added false stations June 11, 2024 onwards. 120.29.79.203 (talk) 10:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Recurring vandalism. Please provide semi-protection, at-least till 23rd Aug (National Space Day). Samuel Johnson (talk) 13:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Rolling IPs copying different article into this one. The same person vandalizing International Commerce Centre (the sister building). A page protection was added a few days ago to that article, this one needs also. This is a LTA involving many buildings, still researching extent. GreenC 15:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been vandalism for the last few months by IPs and recently registered users. Felicia (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the purview of Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding unsourced information, including death claims, to a BLP. DonIago (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target. Panian513 19:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target. Panian513 19:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent messing around with broadcast years by ip hopper. CRBoyer 19:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Recent allegations of pedophilia and other misconduct and the amount of edits being made to the page in response AML KING (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 for ECP because of BLP violations by autoconfirmed users. C F A 💬 22:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Everyone is fighting over whether the Indian or Pakistan athlete should be in the main photo. Knitsey (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 Reason: Lots of IP vandalism is going on here after a Pakistani athlete won an Olympic gold while Indian athlete came second. Indian IPs are vandalizing the page so it should be protected. Muneebll (talk) 04:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~delta (talkcont) 21:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism arie (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. Daisytheduck talk to me 23:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GraziePrego (talk) 00:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring on use of the phrase "from Catalonia" in lead. Roasted (talk) 00:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 02:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA Wiiformii (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Mother of Adolf Hitler which comes with many people who wish to spin historical circumstances in their favor AML KING (talk) 04:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of "Mount Egmont". ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Reported to WP:ANEW. tgeorgescu (talk) 06:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism, mario edits etc etc, I have made reverted this page probably 5 times today. Partey Lover (talk) 06:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High IP vandalism. The corresponding IP user was blocked for short term two days back but has returned as soon as the block ended. Need a longer block on IP/page protection. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked account (Fenam12 (talk · contribs)), one new account (Ckfrlgud1 (talk · contribs) and several IP addresses - quite possibly the same person - insist on changing the picture, without having the license. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Edit dispute arie (talk) 10:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The only contributions to this article are from socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afv12e. Should be ECP'ed under WP:GS/CASTE/WP:CT/IPA. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of spam links. Jdcomix (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: It was protected over 12 years ago for disruptive editing relating to her death however she has been dead for a while now and I think pending changes or unprotection would be more appropriate 2601:282:4700:272:35EC:1622:12BA:FC6D (talk) 03:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Whitney Houston is not protected. Favonian (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The person who the article is about has since become much more notable and their platform has grown significantly. The page protection was placed more than 8 years ago and no longer applies. BOITOTHEBOI (talk) 07:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined I suppose this is abut the content in your sandbox...so my suggestion is to you let this run via the process laid out at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If it is accepted, protection can easily be lifted. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, so even though I am an autoconfirmed user, I have to go through the process of getting the article confirmed? The protection that's currently on the name is no longer valid. BOITOTHEBOI (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It was a gentle suggestion, as writing an article is a difficult undertaking at best, especially if done the first time. Going via AfC is a good thing in multiple ways: you gain experience, you get feedback from seasoned editors, and it may help avoid mistakes which might get the article deleted rather quickly. A quick link to WP:YOUTUBE also seems to be appropriate. I stand by my decision not to unprotect, but if another admin wants to do so: be my guest. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The user who requested protection (User:DJ InstaMalik) has been blocked as a sockpuppet account of the page creator, and they were likely attempting to misuse page protection for ulterior motives. Upon reviewing the page history, most IP edits appear to be constructive, so this protection would seem unnecessary. Since I’m unable to post on the protecting admin’s talk page, I’m submitting the request here. 2405:201:D002:319D:E5F7:B9B3:B48E:C0E (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Daniel Case: Any thoughts? Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    The title is misleading - there have been none in Wales. The page mentions N Wales Police sending reinforcements, and says that there were anti-fascist gatherings in Cardiff to protest expected events that did not happen and 'some far-right demonstrators outside the Senedd, though no conflict materialised' So no riots in Wales. StillMum (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.