Talk:FOB
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Removed Useless Acronym
[edit]I removed an acronym for a Counter-Strike clan, as this is obviously not in widespread use and thus doesn't really belong on the disambaguation page. 162.53.103.225 03:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Freight On Board
[edit]This should be "free on board". Obviously this person who wrote: "freight on board" has no clue about international nor domestic shipment transactions.
fob (plural fobs)
noun
Definition:
1. chain for pocket watch: a chain or ribbon used to attach a pocket watch to a vest
2. ornament on key ring: an ornament attached to a key ring
3. ornament on chain: a watch or ornament worn on the end of a chain or ribbon attached to clothing
4. pocket for watch: a small pocket on a vest for a watch
5. electronic device for opening doors - a small portable electronic device that activates a door lock
[Mid-17th century. Origin ?]
Since there are so many meanings for this term, should we turn this into a disambiguation page? 76.64.185.147 03:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, this IS a disambig page, although a badly written one which needs some cleanup, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). NPalmius 00:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
If it is used by a subpopulation (Desi) of a subpopulation (students) of a single municipality (Toronto), than Fresh off Bloor is too obscure. Moc.aidepikiw 17:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Ghetto FoBulous
[edit]People who are FoBBy and ghetto...e.g. speaks no english, greasy hair, listens to hip-hop music, wears tacky large jewelery/gold chains with large pendant representing his/her FoBBineSS, 20" rims on a Toyota Camry with large decal on rear window. Acts as though his "fobness" is non-existing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MRattu (talk • contribs) 04:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Split or merge
[edit]I think FOB and Fob would be better off as a single dab page Fob. The reader who types "fob" into the "Go" box doesn't care that sometimes it's an acronym and sometimes it's a word. They're looking for an article. Let's help them find it, not make them jump through hoops. No? —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 16:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Totally agree with the sentiment there Drags. I am concerned mostly that there are redirects left right and centre that redirect to the DAB so the user, indeed, clicks a link and then it goes to a DAB which goes to another DAB and so forth. I have tried to clear these up a little but it is still a difficulty, and would be good to get consensus. Meanwhile I am taking a little of WP:BOLD and moving articles to have the same title as the page name' under WP:TITLE, I guess at some time in the past it was moved for example from Faecial to Fecal against WP:ENGVAR but cannot find it, but either way it is inconsistent, either the article title should match the lead or not. So a lot of gnoming along the way, please forgive the imperfections; that is exactly why I wanted others' opinions. It is always a bit tricky to know where to list, so I am quite happy if you know better than me.
Thank you and best wishes Si Trew (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, that seems pretty perfect to me. Good work. I think my consise definitions serve the purpose, since you have not changed them. Seems great to me. Si Trew (talk) 22:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the FOB page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "FOB" page.