Talk:Tor Books
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs updating
[edit]The article has been tagged as needing updating since 2008. I will try to post specific suggestions for changes here. --Pleasantville (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think the long list of authors published by Tor is not particularly useful, and could be cut or eliminated. I would like to see more history of the evolution of the company, though the sourcing is going to be a bit difficult -- I imagine most of it could be found in old issues of Locus, but that would be quite a research project. Mike Christie (talk) 11:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Editors?
[edit]Is the list of editors, which is unreferenced, appropriate for an encyclopedia article? RJFJR (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
I belive that this is an issue, as i did not find any other publishing companies pages that had an editors section. I belive it needs deletion. Deadeye312 (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Tor Books page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Tor Books" page.