Jump to content

Talk:California State Route 75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured articleCalifornia State Route 75 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 20, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 25, 2013Good article nomineeListed
April 18, 2013WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 9, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 75/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 21:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "In 1933, the highway from the San Diego–Coronado Ferry to Route 2 (now I-5) was added to the state highway system.[13] This was later designated as Legislative Route 199.[14]" Merge and mention when Legislative Route 199 was designated.
    "In 1976, the California State Legislature renumbered the southern section (from I-5 to SR 125) SR 117,[49]" Might want to reword this sentence
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Looks pretty good, except for those two little things. SounderBruce 22:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --Rschen7754 22:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Passed SounderBruce 22:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]