Jump to content

Talk:Tusayan, Arizona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

Location

[edit]

Like most articles on Census-designated places, the location of Tusayan is given as the US Census Bureau's location for the geometric center of the CDP. This not official as the USGS is the authoritative source for geographic locations in the United States. According to the US Census Bureau, the CDP location has no legal status.

I have been changing these locations as time permits (which is only occasionally). Since there has been some argument over the use of USCB location data I am going to propose future changes before making them (at least for a while, until I see that there are generally no objections). The following is my proposed change to the geography section of this article. If there are no objections after a few weeks I will make the change.


==Geography==
Tusayan is located at 35°58′24.942″N 112°7′35.601″W / 35.97359500°N 112.12655583°W / 35.97359500; -112.12655583 (35.9735954, -112.1265569)[1].
According to the United States Census Bureau, the geometric center of the CDP is located at 35°58′32″N 112°7′45″W / 35.97556°N 112.12917°W / 35.97556; -112.12917 (35.975674, -112.129046)[2] and has a total area of 28.6 square miles (74.0 km²), of which, 28.6 square miles (74.0 km²) of it is land and 0.04% is water.


Rsduhamel (talk) 00:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For reference's sake, the following is the current listing:

==Geography==
Tusayan is located at 35°58′32″N 112°7′45″W / 35.97556°N 112.12917°W / 35.97556; -112.12917 (35.975674, -112.129046).[2]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the CDP has a total area of 28.6 square miles (74.0 km²), of which, 28.6 square miles (74.0 km²) of it is land and 0.04% is water.

Nyttend (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I really don't think that it's a good idea to offer conflicting ideas of the location. I don't have a problem with replacing the "original" (with the GR1 source) with the GR3 source. I'm unclear, however: where do you get the specific data? The GNIS listings (whether for Tusayan as a populated place or as a CDP) are different from each other, and from the line that you give with the GR3 source. I think that it would be best, rather than giving the location with GR3, to give the location with a GNIS template for the CDP's GNIS entry. Thoughts? Nyttend (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "US Board on Geographic Names". United States Geological Survey. 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  2. ^ a b "US Gazetteer files: 2010, 2000, and 1990". United States Census Bureau. 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Tusayan, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]