Jump to content

Talk:East Asian tea ceremony

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tea ceremony

[edit]

I'm very curious as to why "Japanese tea ceremony" redirects to "Tea ceremony" as if there is only one tea ceremony? In China alone I have experienced five major different sorts of tea ceremony with many variations on each one. I suggest that this topic be moved back to "Japanese Tea Ceremony" with this page used as a disambiguating page for other tea ceremonies. (And yes, I will contribute what I know of some of the other tea ceremonies as I get the full information. I happen to like them.)

Another question is why is this article so empty? Is there no PD description of the ceremony proper available that could be brought in to flesh it out? (Treat these as questions, please, not attacks. I know very little of the Japanese ceremony and there may be a good reason why it is not described.) --Michael 00:47 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Hitting the web, I've found a lot of information on tea ceremonies in general. If there's no objection from anybody here in 24 hours, I'm just going to go and do the reorganisation I mentioned and add, at the same time, an article describing the various Chinese tea ceremonies I know well enough to describe. --Michael 01:04 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)
There were no objections, so the reorganisation has been done, complete with an article detailing the Fujian tea ceremony. --Michael 09:05 7 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Anyone know of some non-Asian tea ceremonies?

Yes, Britain and Ireland have a strong Tea culture, with both topping the European tables for annual tea consumption. Somebody should write a similar article! JDnCoke 22:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC) --Sherdwen 04:51, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of title

[edit]

Why was this article moved to have the title be in capitals? This is against Wikipedia naming conventions. —Umofomia 06:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article

[edit]

As an article this is simply a questionable mishmash of information. Probably we can all agree that a tea ceremony may be a ritualised form of making tea, but to take a description from Japanese tea ceremony and apply it to all tea making is inappropriate and misleading. So is calling Victorian high tea a "tea ceremony." "Tea culture" is a different thing again. This should really be a simple redirect page. Exploding Boy (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tea ceremony is a hugely important ritual, and certainly should not be a redirect. In the past, victorian afternoon tea has been very ritualised. However, the real problem is the equivocation of high tea to afternoon tea. Afternoon tea was a meal between lunch and dinner. Afternoon tea was effectively dinner itself.Anhydrobiosis (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Various forms of tea ceremony are surely important cultural and social practices in various parts of the world, and therefore the existence of a Wikipedia article focusing on this subject is valuable. I believe that the article needs first to delve into why these various forms of so-called tea ceremony have evolved, and to avoid using the expression The Way of Tea (the literal English translation of the Japanese term Chado that came into being in specific connection with the matcha-based practice called chanoyu, or Japanese Tea Ceremony as it is commonly called in English) when discussing the topic of tea ceremony as it is applied to all the various forms which may exist around the world.Tksb (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology of dao/do with respect to tea

[edit]

I reverted the yi back to dao. The dao/do section is dao not yi(arts), chayi is an easy to translate term "tea arts". Here we are talking about the term dao with respect to chadao. icetea8 (talk) 14:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added Teaism section icetea8 (talk) 09:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
icetea8, if you cannot provide references to "Teaism" and "Tea Lore" section, I will remove the section as a violation of WP:OR. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Phoenix7777. I just Google searched for "teaism" and it feels like some kind of Google bomb happening. Lots of hype for a cafe chain. No historical references to "Teaism" (as opposed to "Taoism"). Pignut (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ceremony

[edit]

There is no such thing as American tea ceremony. Drinking the tea doesn't mean that it is a tea ceremony. The tea ceremony, also called the Way of Tea, is a cultural activity involving the ceremonial preparation and presentation of tea. The manner in which it is performed, or the art of its performance, is called Tea ceremony. Zen Buddhism was a primary influence in the development of the tea ceremony. Much different from just drinking a cup of tea. Remove this from the article.Hafspajen (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing

[edit]

Removing the gallery and pictures on thumb sizes. Galleries are not discuraged. Please see also this discussion here, Talk:Charles Marion Russell.

Per WP:IG:

Images are typically interspersed individually throughout an article near the relevant text (see WP:MOSIMAGES). However, the use of a gallery section may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images. The images in the gallery collectively must have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject.

  • This article typically needs illustrations since the Japanese culture and tea ceremony settings are so different from the Western culture that it would be very difficult to describe in words.
  • Image use policy say: Sometimes a picture may benefit from a size other than the default; see the Manual of Style for guidance.


  • Manual of style: **As a general rule, images should not be set to a larger fixed size than the 220px default (users can adjust this in their preferences). 'If an exception to the general rule is warranted', forcing an image size to be either larger or smaller than the 220px default is done by placing a parameter in the image coding.


  • The exception from the general rule is most art and art related articles that they do fall into this cathegory, and they are this exception to the general rule .


Hafspajen (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tea ceremony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 03:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]