Talk:The Theory of the Leisure Class
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Sentence needs rewriting
[edit]I'm a native English speaker and I can't make sense of this (21st century subheading, end of first paragraph). Moved here in case anyone can work on making sense of it:
That the cultural irrelevance of the sociology and the economics of Veblen is in his dismissal of the theory of rational expectations of 18th-century classical economics, and that the American leisure-class would risk social and economic irrelevance if unemployed.[1]
References
MartinPoulter (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the The Theory of the Leisure Class page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "The Theory of the Leisure Class" page.
Categories:
- C-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles